The human nature of Christ
means everything to us and
the subject deserves more
than just ordinary
investigation.
“When we approach
this subject, we would
do well to heed the
words spoken by Christ
to Moses at the burning
bush, ‘Put off thy shoes
from off thy feet, for
the place where on thou
standest is holy
ground.’ We should come
to this study with the
humility of a learner,
with a contrite heart.
And the study of the
incarnation of Christ is
a fruitful field, which
will repay the searcher
who digs deep for hidden
truth.”[1]
In Hebrews 2:16 we read,
“For verily he took not on
him the nature of angels;
but he took on him the seed
of Abraham.” A quick
analysis of this verse might
lead one to rationalize that
if Christ took the seed of
Abraham, He could not have
been the second Adam.
However, the whole human
family has their roots in
Adam, not angels. Paul, whom
I believe wrote both Romans
and Hebrews, gives us
another reason why Christ
was the second Adam. Romans
9:6 says, “. . . they are
not all Israel, which are of
Israel.” Verse seven says, “
. . . In Isaac shall thy
seed be called.” Abraham’s
children, or seed, were to
be of promise. In verse
eight we read, “ . . . the
children of the flesh, these
are not the children of God:
but the children of the
promise are counted for the
seed.” Christ was the Child
of promise, the Son of God.
He would, of necessity, be
the seed of Abraham as He
was born not of the will of
the flesh. John 1:13. There
are only two origins for
man, by the will of the
flesh or directly from God.
Adam was direct from God as
was the second Adam, Jesus
Christ.
“Christ did not make
believe take human
nature; He did verily
take it. He did in
reality possess human
nature. As the children
are partakes of flesh
and blood, He also,
Himself, likewise took
part of the same. He was
the son of Mary; He was
the seed of David
according to human
descent.”[2]
Yes, Jesus was truly a
human being just as much as
was Adam, whom He had
created. Spiritually, He was
the seed of Abraham and,
fleshly, the seed of David.
In Romans 8:3 Paul even
gets a bit more specific, “
. . . God sending his own
Son in the likeness
of sinful flesh . . .” The
inspired commentary on this
verse says, “as the image
made in the likeness
of the destroying serpents
was lifted up for their
healing, so One made ‘in the
likeness of sinful
flesh’ was to be their
Redeemer.”[3]
The people of Israel knew
the brazen serpent was not
one of the fiery serpents,
but it was made in the
likeness of them. Jesus
was made in the likeness
of His brethren. Man was
made in the likeness of God,
but he was not God.
To be born in the flesh,
according to Jesus when He
talked to Nicodemus, was
what made it absolutely
necessary to have a new
birth. John 3:1-6.
Obviously, there is
something wrong with man’s
first birth. “Christ is
called the second Adam. In
purity and holiness,
connected with God and
beloved by God, He began
where the first Adam began.
Willingly He passed over the
ground where Adam fell, and
redeemed Adam’s failure.”[4]
God must be
vindicated for creating man
with a sinless human
nature, for it was in
this nature that man was
overcome. The question was:
Did God make a mistake in
creating man, or was man
responsible for his fallen
condition? Never has God
attempted to claim that
fallen, sinful human nature
can be victorious over
Satan. If that were
possible, all man would need
would be an example to
follow, not a Saviour who on
Calvary’s cross “. . . was
earning the right to become
the advocate of men in the
Father’s presence.”[5]
Jesus must redeem Adam’s
failure, then raise all men
who would accept His plan of
salvation by imputing His
righteousness to them
and giving them a new
nature that God could
work with, for the new
nature does not hate God.
This is what the new birth
is all about.
“While He was free from
the taint of sin, the
refined sensibilities of His
holy nature rendered
contact with evil
unspeakably painful to Him.”[6]
If Christ’s nature were
holy, obviously, it could
not have been sinful. This
could be speaking only of
His human nature for its
sensibilities were refined.
In order for Christ to begin
where Adam began He would,
of necessity, have to have
the same human nature as
Adam had when He began his
life here on earth. “Christ
came to earth, taking
humanity and standing as
man’s representative, to
show in the controversy with
Satan that man, as God
created him, connected
with the Father and the Son
could obey every divine
requirement.”[7]
He had to be tested in the
“as God created him” nature
that Adam was created in.
The first Adam failed the
testing, but the second Adam
succeeded and “His holy
nature” was refined.
The refining and testing
process was a part of the
character building that He
must accomplish on Man’s
behalf. His death then
earned Him the right to
impute this character to
those who will believe and
accept Him as Lord and
Saviour.
If Jesus had a sinful
nature by inheritance, how
could He develop a perfect
character? Paul makes it
very clear that “ . . . the
carnal mind is enmity
against God: for it is not
subject to the law of God,
neither indeed can be.”
Romans 8:7. “The brain is
the capital of the body.”[8]
We must now discover if the
brain, or mind, is also the
nature of man. There is much
misunderstanding in this
area. A clear, penetrating
statement from inspiration
should help us.
“Pure religion has to
do with the will. The
will is the governing
power in the nature of
man, bringing all the
other faculties under
its sway. The will is
not the taste or the
inclination, but it is
the deciding power,
which works in the
children of men unto
obedience to God or unto
disobedience.”[9]
There can be no doubt
that decisions are made in
the brain which is the
capital of the body. We have
learned that the will is the
governing power, or deciding
power, that works in man to
obedience or disobedience.
We have also learned that
this will is the governing
power in the nature of
man. If we accept the
governing power, or deciding
power, to be the same as the
brain, or mind, which is the
capital of the body, we have
our answer. The brain is
also the residence of the
nature of man. Since the
heart and mind are the same,
it follows that when we
receive a new heart, we
receive a new mind, nature
and will.
As to the carnal mind
Paul says, “For to be
carnally minded is death;
but to be spiritually minded
is life and peace.” Romans
8:6. Could this be the
reason that David cried out
in Psalm 51:10, “Create in
me a clean heart, O God; and
renew a right spirit within
me.” and Paul also counseled
the Philippians, “Let this
mind be in you, which was
also in Christ Jesus.”
Philippians 2:5.
Yes, Jesus did have an
advantage over sinful man,
but not over the born-again
Christian.
“Through the victory
of Christ the same
advantages that He had
are provided for man;
for he may be a partaker
of a power out of and
above himself, even a
partaker of the divine
nature, by which he may
overcome the corruption
that is in the world
through lust.”[10]
The nature determines the
character that will be
developed. A sinful or
carnal nature produces a
sinful or carnal character.
It can produce nothing else.
“The idea that it is
necessary only to develop
the good that exists in man
by nature, is a fatal
deception.”[11]
Now we can readily see
why the new birth is
essential in the experience
of every man. However, Jesus
needed no new birth for He
was “that holy thing” or the
Son of God from the
beginning. Luke 1:35. We
become sons or daughters
of God through the new
birth. We had nothing to
do with our first birth, but
we have everything to do
with our second birth. “That
which is born of the flesh
is flesh; and that which is
born of the Spirit is
spirit.” John 3:6
Character acceptable to
God can only be developed in
sinless nature. Jesus, the
second Adam, was born with
this sinless nature. We must
be born into this
sinless nature.
If the carnal mind, or
nature, is “. . . not
subject to the law of God .
. . “ Romans 8:7, and the
law of God is a transcript
of His character, we have a
real problem if we insist
that Christ inherited a
sinful nature.
When Christ took upon
Himself the sins of the
world it did not make Him a
sinner, for He did this
victoriously. He took our
sinful nature the same way.
All the weakness and
hereditary effects, physical
and mental, He took so that
while “Sinless and exalted
by nature, He consented to
take the habiliments of
humanity, to become one with
the fallen race.”[12]
Habiliments, Webster defines
as “characteristic
apparatus.” We could say
identifiable
characteristics.
Why is this important for
us to understand? God’s plan
of salvation requires man to
have a perfect character,
and he does not have this to
offer.
“It was possible for
Adam, before the fall,
to form a righteous
character by obedience
to God’s law. But he
failed to do this, and
because of his sin our
natures are fallen and
we cannot make ourselves
righteous. Since we are
sinful, unholy, we
cannot perfectly obey
the holy law. We have no
righteousness of our own
with which to meet the
claims of the law of
God. But Christ has made
a way of escape for us .
. . He lived a sinless
life. He died for us,
and now He offers to
take our sins and give
us His righteousness . .
. Christ’s character
stand in place of your
character, and you are
accepted before God just
as if you had not
sinned.”[13]
This is the work of
justification which is a
free gift to all who accept
God’s plan.
None of this would have
been possible if Christ had
inherited a sinful nature.
But, thank God, it did
happen and thus we know that
“With an antagonism to evil
such as can exist only in
a nature spotlessly pure,
Christ manifested toward the
sinner a love which infinite
goodness alone could
conceive.”[14]
“The humanity of
Christ reached to the
very depths of human
wretchedness, and
identified itself with
the weaknesses
and necessities
of fallen man, while His
divine nature grasped
the Eternal. His
work in bearing the
guilt of man’s
transgression was not to
give him license to
continue to violate the
law of God, which made
man a debtor to the law,
which debt Christ was
Himself paying by His
own suffering. The
trials and sufferings of
Christ were to impress
man with a sense of his
great sin in breaking
the law of God, and to
bring him repentance and
obedience to that law,
and through obedience to
acceptance with God.
His righteousness He
would impute to man,
and thus raise him in
moral value with God, so
that his efforts to keep
the divine law would be
acceptable. Christ’s
work was to reconcile
man to God through His
human nature, and God to
man through His divine
nature.”[15]
Notice: It was through
Christ’s humanity that
man was to be reconciled to
God. Romans 8:7 tells us, “
. . . the carnal mind
(nature) is enmity against
God: for it is not subject
to the law of God, neither
indeed can be.”
Reconciliation through
sinful human nature is
obviously impossible.
The problem is that man has
always tried to solve his
sin problem by bringing
Christ down to man’s own
sinful nature, rather than
allowing Christ to bring man
up from his fallen, sinful
nature through His imputed
righteousness to stand
before God with a new nature
that God can work with. The
new nature does not hate
God. However, man’s new
nature must also be refined,
and this is the work
sanctification accomplishes.
We can scarcely believe
what the sinful nature has
done to man.
“The result of eating
of the tree of knowledge
of good and evil is
manifest in every man’s
experience. There is in
his nature a bent to
evil, a force which,
unaided, he cannot
resist. To withstand
this force, to attain
that ideal which in his
inmost soul he accepts
as alone worthy, he can
find no help but in one
power. That power is
Christ.”[16]
“The inheritance
of children is that of
sin. Sin has
separated them from God.
Jesus gave His life that
He might unite the
broken links to God.
As related to the first
Adam, men receive from
him nothing but guilt
and the sentence of
death.”[17]
In order for Christ to
unite the broken links
(which includes the whole
human family), He must have
an entirely different
nature than we are born with.
“Man could not atone
for man. His sinful,
fallen condition
would constitute him an
imperfect offering, an
atoning sacrifice of
less value than Adam
before his fall. God
made man perfect and
upright, and after his
transgression there
could be no sacrifice
acceptable to God for
him, unless the offering
made should in value
be superior to man as he
was in his state of
perfection and innocency.”[18]
The sinful, fallen
condition is sinful, fallen
nature. This is that
which is passed on from
generation to generation. It
is this inherited
condition that would
have constituted Jesus an
imperfect offering, had He
inherited sinful nature.
Every offering selected
must be without blemish of
any kind. “In the days of
ancient Israel the
sacrifices brought to the
high priest were cut open to
the backbone to see if they
were sound at heart.”[19]
Jesus Christ must be pure
without spot or blemish. 1
Peter 1:19. Webster defines
a blemish as “an
imperfection that mars or
damages immaculateness.”
It is, then, quite clear how
sinful, fallen condition,
if inherited by Jesus,
would have constituted Him
an imperfect offering.
Hence, the offering would
have to be rejected by the
Father. However, He was
accepted, the atonement was
perfect—without sin or
blemish.
“The incarnation of
Christ has ever been,
and will ever remain a
mystery. That which is
revealed, is for us and
for our children, but
let every human being be
warned from the ground
of making Christ
altogether human, such a
one as ourselves; for it
cannot be.”[20]
We must learn that
sinful nature cannot be
controlled, modified or
improved in any way.
Both the Old Testament and
the New Testament teach
this.
Isaiah 64:6 “But we are
all as an unclean thing, and
all our righteousnesses are
as filthy rags . . . “
Job 14:4 “Who can bring a
clean thing out of an
unclean? not one.”
Psalms 51:10 “Create in
me a clean heart, O God; and
renew a right spirit within
me.”
Ezekiel 36:26-7 “A new
heart also will I give you,
and a new spirit will I put
within you: and I will take
away the stony heart out of
your flesh, and I will give
you a heart of flesh.”
John 12:24 “Verily,
verily, I say unto you,
Except a corn of wheat fall
into the ground and die, it
abideth alone: but if it
die, it bringeth forth much
fruit.”
2 Corinthians 5:17
“Therefore if any man be in
Christ, he is a new
creature: old things are
passed away; behold, all
things are become new.”
Galatians 5:24 “And they
that are Christ’s have
crucified the flesh with the
affections and lusts.”
“The Christian’s life is
not a modification or
improvement of the old, but
a transformation of
nature. There is a
death to self and sin, and a
new life altogether.
This change can be brought
about only by the effectual
working of the Holy Spirit.”[21]
If we picture Christ with
a sinful nature He
would have had to undergo
this same transformation.
But the devil could find not
even an inclination
(propensity) upon which to
build his temptations when
tempting Christ. This
would not have been the case
if Christ had inherited
sinful nature.
“When Christ bowed
His head and died, He
bore the pillars of
Satan’s kingdom with Him
to the earth. He
vanquished Satan in the
same nature over which
in Eden Satan obtained
the victory. The
enemy was overcome by
Christ in His human
nature.”[22]
In His human nature
Christ overcame Satan.
This, sinful human nature
cannot do. It (the
sinful nature) must die and
be replaced, and man must be
a partaker of Christ’s
divine nature before he can
live a victorious life.
“Be careful,
exceedingly careful as
to how you dwell upon
the human nature of
Christ. Do not set Him
before the people as a
man with the
propensities
(inclinations) of sin.
He is the second Adam.
The first Adam was
created a pure, sinless
being, without a taint
of sin upon him; he was
in the image of God.
He could fall, and he
did fall through
transgression. Because
of sin his posterity was
born with inherent
propensities of
disobedience. But
Jesus Christ was the
only begotten (unique)
Son of God. He took upon
Himself human nature,
and was tempted in all
points as human nature
is tempted. He could
have sinned; He could
have fallen, but not for
one moment was there in
Him and evil
propensity.”[23]
Christ is the only child
ever born with sinless human
nature. In this sense He is
truly unique. Notice: Man
inherited his sinful nature.
Christ took upon Him
human nature. “God
desires to heal us, to set
us free. But, since this
requires an entire
transformation, a
renewing of our whole nature,
we must yield ourselves
wholly to Him.”[24]
Since this is His
requirement, we can
understand why, “As Jesus
was in human nature, so God
means His followers to be.”[25]
Does God mean for His
follower to be hampered with
fallen, sinful nature?
What, then, was Christ’s
relation to our sinful human
nature?
“He took upon His
sinless nature our
sinful nature, that
He might know how to
succor those that are
tempted.”[26]
There is a difference
between that which Christ
took upon Himself,
through inheritance, and
what He voluntarily took
in order to win man back to
God. He humbled Himself
until there was no lower
place to which He could
descend. He became
experientially acquainted
with the weakest of the
weak. All our
infirmities, handicaps of
whatever nature, He was
willing to bear. But, we
must remember Christ always
retained His perfect
hatred for sin. If
Christ had inherited a
sinful nature there would
have been an unbearable
dichotomy between His
two natures, rather than
perfect peace. Is
that what God desires His
children to have?
“Christ could have
done nothing during His
earthly ministry in
saving fallen man if the
divine had not been
blended with the human.
The limited capacity of
man cannot define this
wonderful mystery—the
blending of the two
natures, the divine and
the human. It can never
be explained. Man must
wonder and be silent.
And yet man is
privileged to be a
partaker of the divine
nature, and in this way
he can to some degree
enter into the mystery.”[27]
Through the new birth man
is freed from his old nature
by death and receives a new
nature by birth. It is only
in this new nature that we
can be a partaker of the
divine nature. From the
cradle to the grave there
was always that perfect
harmony between Christ’s two
natures.
Anything that man has
used as an excuse for sin,
Jesus was willing to bear—abuse,
loneliness, poverty, being
misunderstood, family
rejection, physical abuse
and pain, mental torture,
apparent failure in life’s
goals, betrayal, worked
against by those closest to
Him, even apparently
forsaken by God Himself.
Is it any wonder that we
have this counsel from God,
“We should have no
misgivings in regard to the
perfect sinlessness of the
human nature of Christ.”[28]
“The exact time when
humanity blended with
divinity, it is not
necessary for us to know.”[29]
May I suggest something that
might throw a bit of light
on the subject?
“Satan with all his
synagogue—for Satan
claims to be
religious—determined
that Christ should not
carry out the counsels
of heaven. After Christ
was baptized, He bowed
on the banks of the
Jordan; and never
before had heaven
listened to such a
prayer as came from His
divine lips. Christ took
our nature upon Himself.
The glory of God, in the
form of a dove of
burnished gold, rested
upon Him, and from the
infinite glory was heard
these words, ‘This is My
beloved Son, in whom I
am well pleased.’”[30]
It is no wonder that
heaven had never heard such
a prayer as came from His
divine lips. If Christ at
this time took the last step
in humbling Himself, just
imagine what that prayer
must have been—an earnest
plea to the Father to now
let the guilt of every sin
man has committed be charged
against Him. Angels and
all heavenly beings must
have been shocked beyond
their capacity to understand
why unworthy, ungrateful,
sinful man should be offered
salvation by Christ
actually taking man’s guilt.
It must have been almost
impossible for them to
comprehend.
Adam became a sinner when
he chose to believe Satan
instead of God. His
nature was changed from
a sinless to a
sinful nature. Christ
chose to take upon Himself
the guilt of the world
which included man’s
sinful nature. The
cleansing process must reach
beyond the deeds of man
even to the source—the
nature or mind of man. It is
thus that Christ can give us
a new mind, heart or nature.
This process accomplishes
man’s complete restoration
and at the same times
does not contaminate the
Restorer, for the
guilt was not His own but
ours—hence victorious and by
His own choice. Oh, the
wonder of God’s plan of
redemption.
When Christ entered the
wilderness of temptation He
bore the heavy burden of
guilt for the sins of the
world. This was a burden too
great for any being less
than God. Christ was fully
divine and fully human, a
mystery we cannot fathom.
If Christ had a sinful
human nature as an inherited
part of Him, He could not
have been the express image
of His Father. Webster
defines sinful as “full of
sin.” He, Himself, said, “ .
. . he that hath seen me
hath seen the Father . .
. “ John 14:9. (Italics
supplied.)
Inherited sinful human
nature can, to a limited
degree, be held in control.
But, is this freedom that
Christ offers the believer?
How can we be delivered both
from the power and the
penalty of sin? “If the
Son therefore shall make you
free, ye shall be free
indeed.” John 8:36.
(Italics supplied.)
If Christ’s perfect
life of obedience was
achieved through perfect
control of His sinful nature,
then His example for us is
to control our natural
sinful natures. The Bible,
however, declares that
nature to be
incorrigible and that
it must die, and we must be
born again. God’s desire
is expressed in this
quotation: “He would have us
comprehend something of His
love in giving His Son to
die that He might counteract
evil, remove the defiling
stains of sin from the
workmanship of God, and
reinstate the lost,
elevating and ennobling the
soul to its original
purity through Christ’s
imputed righteousness.”[31]
This imputing of His
righteousness is the work He
is doing now for all who
truly believe. He is
preparing men and women,
through justification, by
willingly taking the
responsibility for the sins
recorded against them and
changing their record to
read “just as if we had
never sinned.”
It would have
accomplished nothing for
Christ to have accepted
sinful nature and even lived
without sinning outwardly.
The law of God convicts of
sin, not only in the act,
but in the thought.
“The law of God, as
presented in the
Scriptures, is broad in
its requirements. Every
principle is holy, just,
and good. The law lays
men under obligation to
God; it reaches to the
thoughts and feelings;
and it will produce
conviction of sin in
every on who is sensible
of having transgressed
its requirements. If
the law extended to the
outward conduct only,
men would not be guilty
in their wrong thoughts,
desires, and designs.
But the law requires
that the soul itself
be pure and the mind
holy, that the thoughts
and feelings may be in
accordance with the
standard of love and
righteousness.”[32]
The sinful nature
constitutes the disease
of sin, the sins are but
the symptoms of the
disease. “ . . . the
whole head is sick, and the
whole heart faint.” Isaiah
1:5. If Christ had lived a
perfect life while
possessing inherited
sinful nature, He would
still be infected with
the disease and He
would have had to have a
Saviour for Himself.
If His nature was
what kept Him from having
sinful desires, it could
not have been sinful
nature. If He had
sinful desires but
resisted them, it would have
contaminated Him, for in
the thought is the seed
of sin.
How can we deal with
Hebrews 4:15? “For we have
not an high priest which
cannot be touched with the
feeling of our infirmities;
but was in all points
tempted like as we are, yet
without sin.”
In order to think our way
through this problem it is
necessary for us to set
aside our preconceived ideas
and try to see sin as God
sees it. Selfishness, or
self-idolatry, is the
foundation of all sin.
(See Testimony Treasures,
vol. 1, p. 518 and The
Great Controversy, p.
294.) At this altar every
human being has worshiped.
He either worships himself
or hates himself. Jesus
said, “He that loveth his
life shall lose it; and he
that hateth his life in this
world shall keep it unto
life eternal.” John 12:25.
This is the same message
Jesus gave to Nicodemus in
John 3:6, “That which is
born of the flesh is flesh;
and that which is born of
the Spirit is spirit.” How
was Christ tempted as we
are, yet without sin? If
selfishness is the root of
all sin, then different
sins are but
variations of the plant from
which they grow. It
would be true that the more
carefully self was
camouflaged within the
temptation, the stronger
would be the temptation.
Now we know that “ . . .
God cannot be tempted with
evil . . . “ James 1:13.
Christ, while on earth was
wholly God and wholly man.
Because Christ’s human
nature was sinless, as was
Adam’s nature when he was
created, and Christ’s divine
nature was God’s nature,
there was complete
harmony between His two
natures—His human and
divine.
“Christ ever retained the
utmost hatred for sin . . .
“[33]
He hated sin with a perfect
hatred.
“In the unregenerate
heart there is a love of sin
and a disposition to cherish
and excuse it. In the
renewed heart there is
hatred of sin and a
determined resistance
against it.”[34]
“Through an appreciation
of the character of Christ,
through communion with God,
sin will become hateful to
us.”[35]
“He (God) proposes to
remove from man the
offensive thing that He
hates, but man must
co-operate with God in
the work. Sin must be
given up, hated, and the
righteousness of Christ
must be accepted by
faith. Thus will the
divine co-operate with
the human.”[36]
How can God develop in
man hatred for sin when man
has a nature that hates God
instead of sin? Romans 8:7.
It is only accomplished by
Paul’s counsel in the same
letter in chapter 12:2, “And
be not conformed to this
world: but be ye
transformed by the renewing
of your mind, that ye
may prove what is that good,
and acceptable, and perfect,
will of God.” (Italics
supplied.) Then we will “ .
. . Abhor that which is
evil; cleave to that which
is good.” Romans 12:9.
We should be able to
establish the fact that
Satan could not tempt Christ
to do something He hated.
This hatred for sin was
always natural with Christ.
It is not natural with the
human family. We are miles
apart; how can we be tempted
in the same way?
We must remember that it
was on this point that the
most powerful being who was
ever created fell.
Selfishness manifested
itself in pride, jealousy,
deceitfulness and open
rebellion. Our first parents
were victims of the same
temptation. Eve was tempted
to question why God withheld
the fruit of the tree of
knowledge of good and evil.
This became very strong when
she thought the serpent had
gained his capacity to speak
by eating of this fruit.
“Why should I not have such
wonderful fruit?” This is
selfishness of the most
common kind. Adam determined
to share her fate, thinking
his act was one of true
love. He dared to hope that
things could come out
somehow, as long as he got
what he wanted. This was
pure selfishness! Remember,
all of this activity was
entered into while the
individuals possessed
sinless natures. It was the
same with every fallen
angel. This must be the
method Satan used on Christ,
as well as on man. How could
he get Christ to reveal
selfishness that would not
look like selfishness? The
answer lies in the following
inspired quotations:
“It was a difficult
task for the Prince of
life to carry out the
plan which He had
undertaken for the
salvation of man, in
clothing His divinity
with humanity. He had
received honor in the
heavenly courts and was
familiar with absolute
power. It was as
difficult for Him to
keep the level of
humanity as for men to
rise above the low level
of their depraved
natures, and be
partakers of divine
nature.”[37]
“To keep His glory veiled
as a child of the fallen
race, this was the most
severe discipline to which
the Prince of life could
subject Himself.”[38]
The divine nature He had
set aside was sinless,
perfect and familiar with
absolute power. It was
extremely difficult for
Christ, while on earth, to
keep His natural divine
nature from showing
through His new human
sinless nature. This
nature had been weakened by
four thousand years of sin.
When we are born again and
Christ gives us a new
sinless nature, it is
extremely difficult for us
to keep our crucified and
buried natural nature
which was sinful, vile
and filled with pride
from showing through our
born-again new nature.
Satan’s continuous
temptations hurled at Christ
throughout His human life
were to tempt Him to
reveal that divine nature.
“If you are the Christ,
prove it.” These were the
words spoken by humans, as
well as by Satan, to Jesus.
Never was Christ free from
this temptation. His own
family and closest disciples
often urged Him along this
line.
Rulers, priests and
leaders were used by Satan
to try to force Him to
take Himself out of His
Father’s hands and use His
own power. Jesus must,
though familiar with
absolute power, remain true
to His chosen position, “I
can of mine own self do
nothing . . . “ John
5:30. (Italics supplied.)
Satan is constantly
tempting every born-again
Christian, even though he
has a new nature that is
compatible with God, to
reveal the old nature
that he has crucified.
He tempts us through the
products of the old nature
that controlled us for so
long before we were born
again. These products are
our bad habits and
hereditary tendencies.
He knows them well, for he
was the one who developed
them in us. He fans the old
nature into flame through
circumstances and situations
of his own making. He knows
that he cannot
resurrect our old crucified
nature, and Christ would
never resurrect it. We are
the only ones who can be
tempted to do this. It
is through the old habits
that we have not yet
surrendered to Christ that
Satan does his most
efficient work as he tries
to force us to reveal our
old nature. If he can get us
to yield to the habits of
the old self-life often
enough, he knows we will be
more inclined to
discouragement and will give
up. It is when we are
in this condition that
we take ourselves out of
Christ’s control and often,
in rebellion, turn away
from God. This, no
doubt, is why Christ
would not be discouraged.
Christ was constantly
tempted to do even the good
things that He did by
using His own power—as
we are constantly tempted to
take ourselves away from
Christ and “do our own
thing,” whether good or bad.
Total surrender was
Jesus’ only safety, and so
it is for us. He was,
indeed, tempted in all
points like as we are. Every
temptation is, and always
has been, a temptation to
demonstrate selfishness
in one degree or another.
Selfishness always separates
from God. This is Satan’s
goal.
If Christ had used His
own power by His own choice
He would not have been a
perfect example for us to
follow, thus the plan of
salvation would have failed,
for He would not have
demonstrated perfect trust
in His Father.
“Jesus revealed no
qualities, and exercised no
powers, that men may not
have through faith in Him.
His perfect humanity is that
which all His followers may
possess, if they will be in
subjection to God as He
was.”[39]
Perfect trust is what
righteousness by faith is
all about!
In order to inspire in
man that perfect trust,
God’s plan of salvation
establishes a relationship
between the human family and
divinity that will never
end. “To assure us of His
immutable counsel of peace,
God gave His only-begotten
Son to become one of the
human family, forever to
retain His human nature.”[40]
“The Son of God now at
the Father’s right hand,
still pleads as man’s
Intercessor. He still
retains His human nature,
is still the Saviour of
mankind.”[41]
“ . . . He gave His
only-begotten Son to come to
earth, to take the nature of
man, not only for the brief
years of life, but to retain
His nature in the heavenly
courts, an everlasting
pledge of the
faithfulness of God.”[42]
“In passing from the
scenes of humiliation,
Jesus lost none of His
humanity . . . He never
forgets that His is our
representative, that He
bears our nature.”[43]
“That Christ should
take human nature,
and by a life of
humiliation elevate
man in the scale of
moral worth with God: He
should carry His adopted
nature to the throne of
God, and there present
His children to the
Father, to have
conferred upon them an
honor exceeding that
conferred upon the
angels,—this is the
marvel of the heavenly
universe, the mystery
into which angels desire
to look.”[44]
“Christ’s work was to
reconcile man to God through
His human nature, and God to
man through His divine
nature.”[45]
“God desires to heal us,
to set us free. But since
this requires an entire
transformation, a renewing
of our whole nature, we
must yield ourselves wholly
to Him.”[46]
“In heaven it is said
by the ministering
angels: The ministry
which we have been
commissioned to perform
we have done. We pressed
back the army of evil
angels. We sent
brightness and light
into the souls of men,
quickening their memory
of the love of God
expressed in Jesus.
Their hearts were deeply
moved by a sense of the
sin that crucified the
Son of God. They were
convicted. They saw the
steps to be taken in
conversion; they felt
the power of the gospel;
their hearts were made
tender as they saw the
sweetness of the love of
God. They beheld the
beauty of the character
of Christ. But with the
many it was all in vain.
They would not
surrender their own
habits and character.”[47]
“Through the victory
of Christ the same
advantages that He had
are provided for man;
for he may be a partaker
of a power out of and
above himself, even a
partaker of the divine
nature, by which he may
overcome the corruption
that is in the world
through lust.”[48]
“All the natural
goodness of man is worthless
in God’s sight. He does
not take pleasure in any man
who retains his old
nature, and is not so
renewed in knowledge and
grace that he is a new man
in Christ.”[49]
“He would have us
comprehend something of
His love in giving His
Son to die that He might
counteract evil, remove
the defiling stains of
sin from the workmanship
of God, and
re-instate the lost,
elevating and ennobling
the soul to its original
purity through Christ’s
imputed righteousness.”[50]
This is the work to be
accomplished in every
born-again Christian through
God’s unspeakable gift of
justification through faith.
The question that must be
answered is: If Christ had a
sinful human nature, is He
to retain that nature
throughout eternity? If not,
then He had to be freed from
that sinful nature sometime.
When did this
occur?—certainly not at
Calvary! He was a perfect
offering—not a flaw of any
kind was in Him. If Christ
had entertained an evil
thought even once, He could
have accomplished nothing
more than any other human
priest. Every human priest,
by birth, had been
contaminated with sinful
human nature. Therefore, he
must first make an offering
for himself each year
(Hebrews 9:7) before he
could serve as a type of
Christ. We can then rest
assured that at the cross
“He (Christ) vanquished
Satan in the same nature
over which in Eden Satan
obtained the victory.”[51]
That nature was, obviously,
sinless human nature for
that is the way Adam was
created. He (Adam) was also
defeated in his sinless
human nature.
If Christ, at the cross,
had the same human nature
Adam had when he was
created, He could not have
sinful nature at the same
time. A house divided
against itself cannot stand.
His sinless human nature did
not, however, relieve His
suffering at the cross or
throughout His lifetime. He
did take His sinless human
nature with Him into heaven
and will bear it forever,
united and identified with
humanity eternally.
“Christ was not
insensible to ignominy
and disgrace. He felt it
all most bitterly. He
felt it as much more
deeply and acutely than
we can feel suffering,
as His nature was
more exalted and pure,
and holy than that of
the sinful race for whom
He suffered.”[52]
We are delivered from our
sinful human nature through
the new birth experience.
Christ, however, needed not
to be born again. His birth
was into the same perfection
Adam was created in. Baptism
for Christ was not a symbol
of death, burial and
resurrection to newness of
life. His was an example for
us to follow. Every human
being must be free from his
sinful human nature which is
“enmity against God” (Romans
8:7) before he can be a
follower of God. This
transformation Jesus did not
need, for He was the second
Adam.
Sinful human nature will
be a thing of the past in
the new earth. To the
born-again Christian,
freedom from that sinful
nature—through God’s plan of
salvation—makes it possible
for heaven to begin here on
earth. How thankful we
should be that our Saviour
has identified Himself with
the human family by
retaining our human nature
forever.
Notes
[1]
The Youth’s Instructor,
October 13, 1898.
[2]
The Review and Herald,
April 5, 1906.
[3]
The Desire of Ages,
pp. 174, 175. (Italics
supplied.)
[4]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol 7A, p. 650,
The
Youth’s Instructor,
June 2, 1898.
[5]
The Desire of Ages,
p. 745.
[6]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 7A, p. 655,
The
Review and Herald,
November 8, 1887.
[7]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 7A, p. 650,
The
Signs of the Times,
June 9, 1898.
[8]
Messages to Young People,
p. 236.
[9]
Messages to Young People,
p. 151.
[10]
The Signs of the Times,
April 25, 1892.
[11]
Steps to Christ, pp.
18, 19. (Italics
supplied.)
[12]
The Signs of the Times,
January 16, 1896.
[13]
Steps to Christ, p.
62.
[14]
Patriarchs and Prophets,
p. 140. (Italics
supplied.)
[15]
Selected Messages,
book 1, pp. 272, 273.
(Italics supplied.)
[17]
Child Guidance, p.
475. (Italics supplied.)
[18]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 7A, p. 665,
The
Spirit of Prophecy,
vol. 2 (1877 ed.) pp.
9,10. (Italics
supplied.)
[19]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 1, p. 1110,
Manuscript 42, 1901.
(Italics supplied.)
[20]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 5, p. 1129, Letter
8, 1895. (Italics
supplied.)
[21]
The Desire of Ages,
p. 172. (Italics
supplied.)
[22]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 7A, p. 651,
The
Youth’s Instructor,
April 25, 1901.
[23]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 5, p. 1128, Letter
8, 1895. (Italics
supplied.)
[24]
Steps to Christ, p.
43. (Italics supplied.)
[25]
Testimonies, vol. 8
, p. 289. (Italics
supplied.)
[26]
Medical Ministry, p.
181. (Italics supplied.)
[27]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 7, p. 904, Letter
5, 1889.
[28]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 5, p. 1131,
The
Signs of the Times,
June 9, 1898. (Italics
supplied.)
[29]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 5, p. 1129, Letter
8, 1895.
[30]
Temperance, p. 284.
(Italics supplied.)
[31]
The Review and Herald,
November 8, 1892.
(Italics supplied.)
[32]
Selected Messages,
book 1, p. 211. (Italics
supplied.)
[33]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 7, p. 904,
The
Signs of the Times,
January 20, 1898.
[34]
The Great Controversy,
p. 508.
[35]
The Desire of Ages,
p. 668.
[36]
Testimonies , vol.
5, p. 632.
[37]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 7, p. 930,
The
Review and Herald,
April 1, 1875.
[38]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol. 5, p. 1081, Letter
19, 1901.
[39]
The Desire of Ages,
p. 664.
[40]
The Desire of Ages,
p. 25.
[41]
The Signs of the Times,
July 15, 1908. (Italics
supplied.)
[42]
Selected Messages,
book 1, p. 258. (Italics
supplied.)
[43]
Testimonies to Ministers,
p. 19. (Italics
supplied.)
[44]
Sons and Daughters of
God, p. 22. (Italics
supplied.)
[45]
The Review and Herald,
August 4, 1874. (Italics
supplied.)
[46]
Steps to Christ, p.
43. (Italics supplied.)
[47]
Christ’s Object Lessons,
p. 318. (Italics
supplied.)
[48]
Signs of the Times,
January 16, 1896.
(Italics supplied.)
[49]
God’s Amazing Grace,
p. 66,
The Review and
Herald, August 24,
1897. (Italics
supplied.)
[50]
The Review and Herald,
November 8, 1892.
(Italics supplied.)
[51]
The SDA Bible Commentary,
vol 5, p. 1108,
The
Youth’s Instructor,
April 25, 1901.
[52]
The Review and Herald,
September 11, 1888.
(Italics supplied